Follow the Blog
Don't forget – you can always post, read, and carry out online conversations with the C3 team at our blog.
Secondhand Media: Salvaged Clothing and Global History
Clothing, almost by definition, is a medium of transmission. It is both the means and the site for storage and the spread of information. Clothes are made to be carried by the human body (as in the French porter and the Haitian Creole pote) as the body moves through space, time and life in the world. From their origins in the first days of human culture, textile skins were portable artifacts and temporary prostheses, shaped by the demands of a mobile body and inscribed with markers of that body’s history. The demands on clothing have always been high – armor (protection against shame, enemies, and the elements) and aesthetics, comfort and durability. The portability of clothing, and its proximity to the human body, means that it is also changeable. Clothes are artifacts in continual flux. They convey messages to the world, and they also provide the raw material for subversion of precisely these messages.
Traditionally, vestments were few and far between. Their production took a great amount of human and material resources. Into their tailored forms much was literally and culturally invested. In the Western tradition, throughout the Middle Ages and Renaissance, clothing, once shaped to a given body, might be worn for years, sometimes carried for a lifetime. The clothing wore its owner as much as the owner wore the clothing, bearing comparable markers of a personal narrative. Through the movements of a body in time, its clothes would acquire increasingly personal and human characteristics – worn knees and elbows, a stretched waist. Stains, patches, tears and color changes accompanied a life journey, or at least several decades thereof.
Sometimes an article’s function was portable. This was especially true when even the simplest clothing was scarce, its production costly, time-consuming and labor-intensive. A coat might be cut down into a vest, or a dress into a scarf. As a garment’s function evolved, so too might the identity of its wearer. A dress might be handed from mother to daughter, carrying with it signs and markers of generational passing. A master might give his worn-out shirt to his servant, for whom it could either serve as bodily cover or portable currency. In the Renaissance it was common for servants to sell their masters’ old clothing to peasants in neighboring villages. Itinerant rag and old clothes dealing grew into a veritable calling – a profession of portability. The dealer became an intermediary between wearers, marking a transitional phase in an article’s mobile life history.
The advent of mass reproduction heralded an era of increasing clothing production, in Europe and North America especially. The more clothes there were, the more they changed hands. Cotton gins, mechanical looms and sewing machines made clothing easier to produce and more affordable to populations. By the mid-nineteenth century, prêt-a-porter (ready-to-wear, ready-to-carry) clothing was being produced, traded and consumed in the international market economy. With more clothes for the taking, the middle class purchased more of them, therefore wearing each garment for less and less time.
Fashions changed faster. Clothing, manufactured by a mechanized immigrant labor force, became increasingly inexpensive to produce. Clothes became common instead of rare, and worn clothes were discarded or exchanged at an ever quicker pacer. The paths of clothing increasingly departed from the bodies of single individuals and their families and began to travel the world. The result of excess was a new genre of, and set of possibilities for, salvaged clothing as a medium of grassroots circulation, transformation and exchange.
A range of paths developed for the second (and third and fourth) lives for secondhand clothing by the nineteenth century. A “shoddy” industry developed in England and North America, alongside the textile mills of the old and new Englands. Shoddy originally referred to a durable fabric woven out of a yarn spun of shredded refuse woolens. Shoddy, which stuffed the interiors of horse-drawn carriages, was refashioned into the wool uniforms and blankets that American and British soldiers carried on their bodies and wrapped around their fears in World War One.
By the early twentieth century, secondhand clothing was resold in shops and through itinerant merchants. Most of these junk and rag dealers were enterprising Jewish and Italian immigrants. In New York City, for example, ragmen collected cast-offs from uptown and carried them downtown for purchase by recent arrivals in need of inexpensive clothing. A new set of bodies, and a new set of histories, carried the old clothes into new places and directions.
A wool suit jacket tailored on the Upper West Side, traveled on the back of a wealthy banker between Central Park and Park Avenue. Stained at a champagne toast and discarded after six months, the suit jacket navigated a new existence in the thicket of the Lower East Side. Picked out of a rag dealer’s wheelbarrow, minus several buttons, it was purchased by an Orchard Street milkman who wore it on a daily delivery route winding through Chinatown. The jacket took the shape of its wearer and carried his weight. Traces of the Jewish community – the smells of Eastern European cooking and cast-off buttons hawked by a peddler – were inscribed deep into the warp and woof of the woolen fabric. The satin interior, a second skin lining a second life, carried the increasingly sweat-stained labels naming its original owner and the uptown tailor. Every wearing in is also a wearing out.
Textile media - both the material out of which, new entities are produced, and also the means by which information is encoded and information transmitted – spread across the globe. Clothing’s portability grants it a history of embodiment and transmutation, moving between bodies, cultures, nations and economies; it carries traces of one across the boundaries of another. In the late twentieth and twenty-first centuries, cast-off clothes from North America and Europe increasingly journey overseas en route to encounters with new wearers. Clothes are compressed into half-ton bricks, bales that might contain the shirts off hundreds of human backs. A Panamanian ship, manned by a Romanian crew, carries the discarded textile skins to the port of Port-au-Prince. What arrives in Haiti, called pepe, is a resource to be worn (pote), an identity to be had and a politics upon which to reflect. Pepe is a portable currency whose materiality is transformed by multiple processes of alteration, exchange and wear. Clothing wears the traces, and bears the burdens, of a global media history in progress.
NOTE: Photographs document secondhand clothing’s role in today’s world of spreadable media, as media of communication and subversion of hegemonic styles and economic pathways. Vanessa Bertozzi & Hanna Rose Shell produced images in Haiti, during the summer of 2006, as part of a collaborative ethnographic project that culminated in their experimental media essay Secondhand (Pepe.) [2007, distributed by Third World Newsreel] .For more information: http://www.secondhandfilm.com
Hanna Rose Shell is currently a Fellow at Harvard University, as well as an Assistant Professor in the MIT Program in Science, Technology and Society (STS). As a filmmaker, historian and media scholar with an extensive exhibition and publication record, Hanna Rose Shell combines digital media creation with the following fields: the history of science; critical theory & historiography; film and media history; public history & museum studies; documentary studies; multimedia production and installation art. She has taught lecture, seminar and media production courses at the Rhode Island School of Design (RISD) and at Harvard College. She received her M.A. in American Studies from Yale University in 2002, was a Fellow in Filmmaking at the Film Study Center at Harvard between 2003 and 2005, and was granted her Ph.D. in the History of Science from Harvard University in November 2007. Her digital films and installations, like her dissertation, explore the interwoven themes of media, technology, history and aesthetics.
The Fine Print
You are receiving this update as a member of MIT C3. To subscribe or unsubscribe, send a request to email@example.com.
We are committed to preserving your privacy. Your email address and any other contact details are only used for communication pertaining to C3 business and to maintain our records. The information will not be used for any commercial or philanthropic purpose not directly connected with or supported by MIT without your consent. Any changes to our policy will be posted here in the future. Any information collected prior to the changes will not be subject to the new policy without your consent. The information will remain subject to the policy at the time it was provided to us. Once the change in policy is posted, any new information that you provide and/or information associated with new orders will be subject to the new policy.
This newsletter is provided as internal communication for C3 employees and graduate students, consulting researchers, and employees of C3's corporate partners. This e-mail publication is not to be shared with parties that do not have affiliation with the Consortium, in either electronic or printed form, without the permission of the Consortium's management.
The statements and opinions expressed in the C3 newsletter are those of the authors, individuals and/or contributors, and are not necessarily those of CMS or C3, its faculty or consortium members.
The MIT C3 Weekly Update is Copyright © 2008 by the MIT Convergence Culture Consortium. All rights reserved.